> Do you have any more details on this for those who don't
> normally follow DNSSEC?
It is a sad story. Politics and the magic circle. If people are wondering
why the major industry players have abandoned the IETF read on. This is only
one example of the type, other companies have similar issues.
> Especially for domains, it's important to do some validation,
> though in the absence of widely-deployed DNSSEC, it's hard to
> do automatically.
DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for
refusing the working group consensus and imposing their own
idea that cannot be deployed.
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
I propose as a minimum:
1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses with the
service.
2) Permit mail sender to quickly determine whether a given email is o
in service or
not. Alan knows quite a few addresses that get spammed that are invalid.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:21 PM
> To: 'Steve Schear'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTEC
