On 7/12/05, Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How secure can I make a Java sandbox from the rest of the network I'm on?
> Can I make it so that my network administrator can't see what I'm typing? In
> other words, a secure environment that's sitting on an insecure machine.
Although you ask
eprint.iacr.org/2005/186 is an attack by Xuesheng Zhong on several
blind signature schemes, including one widely discussed on the
Cypherpunks mailing list back in the 1990s by Stefan Brands. The paper
seems to show that it is possible for the bank/mint to recognize blind
signatures (i.e. untraceabl
> Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/13/0250226
>[1]DocMurphy asks: "I'm working with some dissidents who are looking
>for ways to use the Internet from within repressive regimes. Many have
>in-home Internet access, but think it too risky to participate in
>pro-freedom a
> Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my
> credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the
> following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer
> in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these.
A
We already have de facto national ID in the form of our state driver's
licenses. They are accepted at face value at all 50 states as well as
by the federal government. Real ID would rationalize the issuing
procedures and require a certain minimum of verification. Without it
we have security that is
A Politech article forwarded email from a liar named <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >From the EE-Times, a between the lines look at the future of RFID tracking:
>
> re: E-passport makers hail U.S. retreat
>
> Junko Yoshida [FAIR USE]
> EE Times
> (04/29/2005 1:38 PM EDT)
>
> PARIS - Global electronic p
On 5/9/05, Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If user A has the integer a and user B has the integer
> b, can a zero knowledge proof be developed to show
> that a>b,ahttp://www.cs.huji.ac.il/labs/danss/Fairplay/
CP
>[1]Autoversicherung writes "Physicists including Purdue's Ephraim
>Fischbach have completed a study [2]comparing the 'randomness' in pi
>to that produced by 30 software random-number generators and one
>chaos-generating physical machine. After conducting several tests,
>they ha
A remailer posted about EncFS. Gerow quoted the first paragraph and
added the criticism that it doesn't do locking. Dixon saw the quoted
first paragraph, which said that the link to the program was "below".
And indeed, it was below, in the first message from the remailer. It
included this link, htt
> Matthew's snapshots: one
> (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs-2.jpg), two
> (http://www.boingboing.net/images/Liberty-Locker-Thumbs1.jpg).
If this were really as much of a conspiracy as people are making it
out to be, wouldn't it make sense to ask for THUMB prints? that's wh
The question is, with regard to Google, does turning "personal
history" on or off make a difference in what records they keep about
your searches? Obviously if it's on they do keep records, but if you
disable it or never turn it on, does that mean that they don't keep
records?
http://www.google.co
On 4/27/05, Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hum.
>
> Can anyone figure out a way to determine if one's hotmail, etc...has been
> looked at or not?
By whom? Someone at hotmail, or someone who got your password and
logged in as you?
Hotmail shows mail that has already been viewed in a di
On 4/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Slightly IRS forms that enable filers to legally (according to Sullivan vs.
> U.S. and subsequent Supreme Court rulings), and innocously, assert their 5th
> Amendment privilege against self-incrimination on a line-item basis have been
>
On 4/8/05, Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> U.S. Patent 4,759,063 "Blind Signature Systems" will expire on July 19,
> 2005. A Tuesday. Since no patent litigator will consider litigating on a
> Monday morning over patent infringement for a patent that expires the next
> day, it appears safe
On Apr 7, 2005 10:13 AM, Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am a little confused after reading this:
>
> http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/cryptobytes/CryptoBytes_January_2002_final.pdf
>
> RSA-CRT decryption is nearly four times faster than
> using only modular exponentiation for
An article is up on the eprint archive,
http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/095. "Security and Privacy Issues in
E-passports" by Ari Juels and David Molnar and David Wagner. It
analyzes the new contactless chips which will be in U.S. passports in
a few months.
Among the risks it identifies are that terror
On Apr 1, 2005 10:57 AM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now here's your one stop shop for evil. A position for Google minister for
> propaganda is about to be posted, so I hear.
Let's get this straight. It's not evil if people are voluntarily
agreeing to it! Maybe you're being facetious
Please pass this around..
Mar 13th 2003
Rogue Cypherpunks Physical Meeting Announcement
General Info:
DATE: Thursday 13 Mar 2003
TIME: 5:30 - 7:00 PM (Pacific Time)
PLACE: Stevenson Student Union
Southern Oregon University
(second Floor lounge) see
http://www.sou.edu/su/Facilities/Layout
maybe Kalifornians should start an referendum to drug test politicians... since
most of them are dopes anyway...
At 9:22 AM -0700 6/14/02, Khoder bin Hakkin wrote:
>SACRAMENTO -- Dismayed by new disclosures of the use of steroids in
>Major League Baseball, a state senator wants to force most p
19 matches
Mail list logo
