At 10:07 PM 06/26/2002 -0700, Lucky Green wrote:
>An EMBASSY-like CPU security co-processor would have seriously blown the
>part cost design constraint on the TPM by an order of magnitude or two.
Compared to the cost of rewriting Windows to have a infrastructure
that can support real security? M
"R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>WAVE, some of you might remember, was started by a former NatSemi Chairman
>back before the internet got popular. It was going to be a dial-up book-entry-
>to-the-screen content control system with special boards and chips patented to
>down to it's so
Bob wrote quoting Mark Hachman:
> The whitepaper can not be considered a roadmap to the design
> of a Palladium-enabled PC, although it is one practical
> solution. The whitepaper was written at around the time the
> Trusted Computing Platform Association
> (TCPA) was formed in the fall of 2000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured this was probably going on, but the following article is my
first confirmation.
WAVE, some of you might remember, was started by a former NatSemi
Chairman back before the internet got popular. It was going to be a
dial-up book-entry-to-the-
