Neo-Cons, Fundies, Feddies,Con-Artists (was re: "Useless Eaters")

2003-09-21 Thread R. A. Hettinga
ies, Feddies, and Con-Artists  PressInfo # 189 September 18, 2003 By Francis A. Boyle , TFF Associate Originally posted on the 'AALS Section on Minority Grps. mailing list' It is now a matter of public record that immediately after the terrible tragedy of 11 September 200

Re: movie distribution post copyright (Re: Artists)

2002-07-08 Thread jamesd
-- Obviously, the end of copyright may well mean a substantial reduction in the proceeds from big movies, but it will hardly mean a total end to those proceeds (the powerpuff girl movie is one big toy advertisment) How big an effect will a reduction in money mean? If you go back thirty years

Re: Artists

2002-07-08 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 4:49 PM -0400 on 7/8/02, Mark Burns wrote: > Hopefully this 'what-if' world has anti-trust deregulation going hand in > hand with the removal of copyright protection. Nah. All we need is encryption and a cash-settled digital market. Studios would do just fine, maybe better. Cheers, RAH --

Re: movie distribution post copyright (Re: Artists)

2002-07-08 Thread mean-green
>At 10:20 PM 7/8/2002 +0100, Adam Back wrote: >But right now copies of recent release movies (post screen release, but pre DVD/VHS relase) are not generally available in high quality format, suitable for projecting. As you note later, most recent releases to the Net are often lower quality 'cams'

Re: Artists

2002-07-08 Thread Mark Burns
Tim May: > People would go to theaters to see the film in all of its glory, true. > > But the theaters would no longer, in your scenario, have to fork over > money to the studios. > > (Or that theaters would face special regulation by government, etc.) Hopefully this 'what-if' world has anti-trus

movie distribution post copyright (Re: Artists)

2002-07-08 Thread Adam Back
But right now copies of recent release movies (post screen release, but pre DVD/VHS relase) are not generally available in high quality format, suitable for projecting. So one way that the movie distribution industry could plausibly continue to make money would be rather than the movie theatre be

Re: Artists

2002-07-08 Thread Tim May
There's a flaw in this argument: On Monday, July 8, 2002, at 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Let us imagine that all efforts to enforce copyright on the > internet were abandoned, and that everyone in the world has a fat > pipe capable of downloading movies. > > First, most people who want

RE: Artists

2002-07-08 Thread Trei, Peter
> Marcel Popescu[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Regarding our recent thread on copyrights and artists who won't create > anymore if they're not getting paid, has anyone ever played with the > WinAmp > plug-ins? Some of them are amazingly beautiful. > > Now, are th

RE: Artists

2002-07-08 Thread jamesd
-- On 8 Jul 2002 at 11:25, Trei, Peter wrote: > Some forms of creation require little in the way of up-front > investment. Others do. Consider movies. While some of the people > involved get to do creative work that they love, many don't, and > they all have to make a living somehow. Would t

Artists

2002-07-07 Thread Marcel Popescu
Regarding our recent thread on copyrights and artists who won't create anymore if they're not getting paid, has anyone ever played with the WinAmp plug-ins? Some of them are amazingly beautiful. Now, are they upset that people copy them? On the contrary - some of them are accused o