At 06:48 PM 4/11/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3611227.stm
>By the year 2010, file-sharers could be swapping news rather than
music,
>eliminating censorship of any kind.
>
>This is the view of the man who helped kickstart the concept of
peer-to-peer
>(P2P) fil
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3611227.stm
File-sharing to bypass censorship
By Tracey Logan
BBC Go Digital presenter
The net could be humming with news, rather pop, swappers
By the year 2010, file-sharers could be swapping news rather than music,
eliminating censorship of any kind.
T
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:41:03PM -0700, Eric Cordian wrote:
>
> As those who flog the Sex Abuse Agenda are well aware, 90% of successful
> propaganda is owning the vocabulary. I am reminded of the changing of the
> term "statutory rape" to "child rape" a few years ago, which I am sure we
> will
Justin wrote:
This is one nation under God (the Christian God), or haven't you
noticed? If the Christian Right thinks God doesn't like something, it's
not Constitutionally protected.
Even worse, I've once heard a coworker explain to me why Bush doesn't give
a rats ass about the environment: just
Harmon Seaver (2004-04-11 20:05Z) wrote:
> This is insane -- on what basis, under what Constitutional authority,
> does the state get to decide that the christer "marriage" vows are
> sacred and legal, and a pagan or indig "taking to wife" isn't?
This is one nation under God (the Christian God),
Eugen Leitl pastes:
> File-sharing to bypass censorship
> By Tracey Logan
> BBC Go Digital presenter
> If there's material that everyone agrees is wicked, like child pornography,
> then it's possible to track it down and close it down
> Ross Anderson, Cambridge University
I think the problem
