Alan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, John Kelsey wrote:
>>but there doesn't seem to be a clean process for determining how
>>skilled an attacker needs to be to, say, scan my finger once, and
>>produce either a fake finger or a machine for projecting a fake
>>fingerprint i
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, John Kelsey wrote:
> but there doesn't seem to be a clean process for determining how
> skilled an attacker needs to be to, say, scan my finger once, and
> produce either a fake finger or a machine for projecting a fake
> fingerprint into the reader.
.. or a replacement reader
>From: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Oct 12, 2004 1:43 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cash, Credit -- or Prints?
..
>Very interesting question. I'd bet almost any amount of money that it's
>fairly trivial to simply
D
From: Frank Siebenlist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cash, Credit -- or Prints?
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:34:19 -0700
Can anyone explain how sophisticated those fingerprint readers are?
_print/0,,SB109744462285841431,00.html>
The Wall Street Journal
October 11, 2004
Cash, Credit -- or Prints?
Fingerprints May Replace
Money, Passwords and Keys;
One Downside: Gummi Fakes
By WILLIAM M. BULKELEY
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
October 11, 2004; Page B1
Fingerprints aren't ju
