At 03:05 PM 7/8/04 -0700, Steve Schear wrote:
At 09:31 PM 7/7/2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:55 PM 7/7/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
A few years ago. Lets call it two years ago. That would make the
average hi-cap drive around 30gb.
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity has increased *faster*
than semiconductor throughput, which has an 18 month doubling time.
But access time has not nearly kept pace. Which is why all manner of
database architectures have been created
At 02:55 PM 7/7/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
A few years ago. Lets call it two years ago. That would make the
average hi-cap drive around 30gb.
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity has increased *faster*
than semiconductor throughput, which has an 18 month doubling time.
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:31:45PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity has increased *faster*
than semiconductor throughput, which has an 18 month doubling time.
Yes. Also, human-generated traffic (the relevant part: which email you write,
which
]
Subject: Re: Faster than Moore's law
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:55:11 +0200
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:31:45PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity has increased *faster*
than semiconductor throughput, which has an 18 month doubling time.
Yes. Also, human
At 09:31 PM 7/7/2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 02:55 PM 7/7/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
A few years ago. Lets call it two years ago. That would make the
average hi-cap drive around 30gb.
Just want to remind y'all that drive capacity has increased *faster*
than semiconductor throughput,
