At 10:00 AM 9/27/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
>Don't forget, the World Trade Center management was on the Intercom
trying
>to tell everyone to "Remain inside the Building...It's safest Inside
the
>Building".
>
>Fuck. Here on Wall Street I'm a dead man.
If you stay in NYC or DC, you are an individ
Half-dozen?
And virgins are WAY overrated.
-TD
From: "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Individual Geopolitical Darwin Awards
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:33:56 -0700
At 10:00 AM 9/27/04 -0400, Tyler Durden
At 8:12 PM -0700 9/20/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>The yank minutemen were not above taking children as soldiers,
>any more than Dan'l Boone was above taking a 14 year old as
>a wife.
That's more a definition of "adult", than anything else.
If they're old enough to blee-... Oh, forget it...
C
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:30PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> fission rate, ie fewer spare neutrons to spoil the fun. Even pure
> Pu-239,
> the result of short irradiation, has a problem with premature
> ejaculation.
So use a tritium-boosted fission nuke. Not as hard to do a true fusion
At 08:46 PM 9/19/04 -0700, John Young wrote:
>Today, even the US uses children in war, 17 being the minimum
>age to enlist. Others sneak in by lying about their age, some as
>young as 14. Recruiters look the other way when the kids
>and their parents lie. Been there, done that. Enlisted in the
>arm
At 11:42 AM 9/20/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>
>> (Remember the
>> Hiroshima bomb was *not* tested, so sure were the scientists.
Trinity
>
>My understanding (and I am *positive* someone will correct me if I'm
>wrong) was that there was a shortage
At 05:07 PM 9/19/04 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>I don't recall the American revolutionaries herding children
>before them to clear minefields, nor surrounding themselves
>with children as human shields.
The yank minutemen were not above taking children as soldiers,
any more than Dan'l Boone w
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, James A. Donald wrote:
> I don't recall the American revolutionaries herding children
> before them to clear minefields, nor surrounding themselves
> with children as human shields.
Using children to clear minefields has its logic. They are often not heavy
enough to trigger
At 04:57 PM 9/19/04 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>But the Saudi Arabian elite, of among which Bin Laden was born with a
>silver spoon in his mouth, are not getting screwed over.
1. you don't get religion
2. UBL's mom was a low-caste yemeni, dig?
t 11:38 PM 9/20/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>At 8:11 PM -0700 9/20/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>>2. UBL's mom was a low-caste yemeni, dig?
>
>Actually, UBL's *dad* was a low-caste Yemeni, too.
>
>And your point is?
That you can be wealthy and still find something of the underdog
in you, whi
At 8:11 PM -0700 9/20/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>At 04:57 PM 9/19/04 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>>But the Saudi Arabian elite, of among which Bin Laden was born with a
>>silver spoon in his mouth, are not getting screwed over.
>
>1. you don't get religion
>2. UBL's mom was a low-caste yem
It's a no, which sure seems to be your answer to my first question.
OK, I understand the "stupid" part, but not the "anxious" part. Should I be
concerned about your interest in Cypherpunks?
('He made an unfavorable, on-point response to John Young,
On-point? It sounded like a mere insult, witho
Tyler Durden wrote:
"Tim" wrote...
Is there any reason other than you being stupid & anxious to offer
some feeble witticism for you to wonder if "we" use binoculars
often? More importantly (at least to some of us), how is that
relevent to anything?
...so that would be a yes, then?
It's a no,
"Tim" wrote...
Is there any reason other than you being stupid & anxious to offer some
feeble witticism for you to wonder if "we" use binoculars often? More
importantly (at least to some of us), how is that relevent to anything?
..so that would be a yes, then?
I'm always interested in sniffing
Is there any reason other than you being stupid & anxious to offer
some feeble witticism for you to wonder if "we" use binoculars often?
More importantly (at least to some of us), how is that relevent to anything?
Tyler Durden wrote:
Tim wrote...
You demonstrate that point well.
Hum. Spend
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> (Remember the
> Hiroshima bomb was *not* tested, so sure were the scientists. Trinity
My understanding (and I am *positive* someone will correct me if I'm
wrong) was that there was a shortage of both fissionable materials and
appropriate [altime
James A. Donald:
> > I don't recall the American revolutionaries herding children
> > before them to clear minefields, nor surrounding themselves
> > with children as human shields.
John Young
> No, not minefields, but a good percentage of Washington's
> army and that of the French, were children.
Tim wrote...
You demonstrate that point well.
Hum. Spend a lot of time with binoculars, do we? How much does the FBI pay
field ops these days?
-TD
_
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-ur
John Young wrote:
What older soft-gutted guys in all nations like most is the
Wagnerian tragedy, the soap opera sturm and drang, of
other people's suffering and death for their loose-screw
agenda.
You demonstrate that point well.
folks get kinda touchy when the exemptions are a little too obvious.
-TD
From: John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:46:27 -0700
James A. Donald:
>I don't recall the American revolutionaries herding c
A solid post. In this context I'd drill down a bit to the idea of
"fanaticism"...
> And if you ask me, fanaticism never lasts very long
> anywhere, only for about a generation during turbulent times.
That is what King George and his redcoats said about the
ragtag colonials, American as well as t
James A. Donald:
>I don't recall the American revolutionaries herding children
>before them to clear minefields, nor surrounding themselves
>with children as human shields.
No, not minefields, but a good percentage of Washington's
army and that of the French, were children. Young boys were
taught
Tyler Durden wrote:
> And if you ask me, fanaticism never lasts very long
> anywhere, only for about a generation during turbulent times.
That is what King George and his redcoats said about the
ragtag colonials, American as well as those who suffered the
king's abuse into the 20th Centruty.
J
On 19 Sep 2004 at 12:15, Tyler Durden wrote:
> My running, personal theory is that Muslim fundamentalism (and in
> general, most fundamentalisms) get going when the locals gain a
> persistent sense that they're gettin' screwed over,
But the Saudi Arabian elite, of among which Bin Laden was born wi
At 12:15 PM 9/19/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
>My running, personal theory is that Muslim fundamentalism (and in
general,
>most fundamentalisms) get going when the locals gain a persistent sense
that
>they're gettin' screwed over,
See "Crusades", which aint over til the tall buildings fall.
and
--
On 16 Sep 2004 at 15:54, Tyler Durden wrote:
> I'll grant there are some fanatics left in Iran, but Iran
> seems increasingly dominated by fairly sleezy clergy/judges.
> Like any government, theirs is deteriorating into a mere
> racket. And if you ask me, fanaticism never lasts very long
> a
--
James A. Donald:
> > Iranian financed military movements, Hezbollah and Sadr,
> > have been fairly well behaved - they don't target other
> > people's children - just their own, but their willingness
> > to cause the deaths of their own children is even more
> > frightening than Al Quaeda's
Hey Hey Hey!
I'm not the original quoter there...watch it!
-TD
From: "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:48:01 -0500 (CDT)
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
> >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:48:01 -0500 (CDT)
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Tyler Durden
rom: ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:45:18 +0100
Tyler Durden wrote:
Who, the Iranians? Which ones are fanatics?
I'
Tyler Durden wrote:
Who, the Iranians? Which ones are fanatics?
I'll grant there are some fanatics left in Iran, but Iran seems
increasingly dominated by fairly sleezy clergy/judges. Like any
government, theirs is deteriorating into a mere racket. And if you ask
me, fanaticism never lasts very l
"Ken Brown" wrote...
Prostitution industry?
Well, Industry from what I understand is probably too strong a term. These
seem to be individual females. And no, they ain't wearin' high heels and hot
pants, so what we're talking about is very, very discrete, and sometimes for
goods and services as o
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
> >They are fanatics. They expect to get a six pack of virgins.
> >And they will say "Hey, it was not us, it was these terrorists
> >who happen to have somehow stolen some nukes from persons
> >unknown. We are completely opposed to terrorism, and are full
Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:50:37 -0700
--
On 15 Sep 2004 at 2:38, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> Maybe they are playing a different game. They [Iran] couldn
--
On 15 Sep 2004 at 2:38, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> Maybe they are playing a different game. They [Iran] couldn't
> use the eventually produced nukes anyway, without being
> showered back with the same kind
They are fanatics. They expect to get a six pack of virgins.
And they will say "Hey,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> How about Iran stating that they're messing with UF6, when Israel[1] is
> a known pre-emptive bomber of Facilities to the East? That's pretty
> much tickling the dragon.
Maybe they are playing a different game. They couldn't use the eventually
At 09:27 AM 9/14/04 -0400, John Kelsey wrote:
>>From: "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Removing chunks with dynamite is trying rather hard for a Darwin
award.
>
>As far as I can tell from what's reported in the new, a great deal of
North Korea's daily operation fits that category.
How a
37 matches
Mail list logo