On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 12:50 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
While I wish Mike were correct that the party would get some spine
just because we tell them to, I'm not holding my breath.
I was expecting better from Geoff.
The LP's traditional heritage was pretty radical about issues
like the draft
hi,
Terrorism only increases.Saying meet fire with fire is
only an anology.The whole world is against the war but
they are all oppurtunists-they will strike only when
they can.The war may do more damage even than all the
oil it can get.
Regards Sarath.
--- Mike Rosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Cordian wrote on March 20, 2003 at 14:35:45 -0800:
Libertarians are people who think the only legitimate use of state force
is to protect them from their slaves.
No libertarian will ever express support for slavery or forced servitude,
except for punishment after due process for a crime
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
It would be great if the UN imposed sanctions on the US and UK and demanded
they turn over their WOMD. And their leaders, including top generals, to the
Hague.
And given the very evident worldwide animosity toward the US today, I'd not
be at
From: Tom Veil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Libertarians are people who think the only legitimate use of state force
is to protect them from their slaves.
Or, Libertarians are people who think that the only legitimate use of state
force is to protect factories from the angry
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 07:52:30PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Given that their platform, and Ralph Nader, calls for 90% tax rates for
those with excessive wealth or income, they're far more statist than
anyone else out there.
Yep -- their platform is extreme. Like I said, I'm not a GP voter.
As
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 07:32 PM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Eric's statement was hyperbole, designed to provoke. My own view is
that the Libertarian Party is being unfortunately wishy-washy when it
comes to the war on Iraq.
It correctly said that troops should not be blamed for
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Bill Frantz wrote:
One view of the war in Iraq is that it is to assure an oil supply so we can
take on Saudi Arabia, home of three quarters of the 911 hijackers.
Makes sense, use Saudia Arabia as a land base to take over Iraq, then
use Iraq as a land base to take over
At 7:52 PM -0800 3/20/03, Tim May wrote:But the imperial power goes after
the skinny kid it knows it can beat
up, not the greater threats in the region (and in the world). Grenada,
Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iraq again. But not North Korea, not
China, not Saudi Arabia, not Russia, not
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
While I wish Mike were correct that the party would get some spine
just because we tell them to, I'm not holding my breath.
I was expecting better from Geoff.
The LP's traditional heritage was pretty radical about issues
like the draft (we opposed
While I wish Mike were correct that the party would get some spine
just because we tell them to, I'm not holding my breath.
I was expecting better from Geoff.
The LP's traditional heritage was pretty radical about issues
like the draft (we opposed it) and drugs (got any good pot?)
and about free
Declan writes:
Eric's statement was hyperbole, designed to provoke. My own view is
that the Libertarian Party is being unfortunately wishy-washy when it
comes to the war on Iraq.
We've had this discussion many times before on this list.
People who know nothing about Libertarians see a word
I agree, and I'm including the LP on cc (which I didn't notice till
I hit reply). Now that congress has voted to support the troops
it's time for a revolution in the ballot box. If enough of us tell
the LP to get some spine, they will!
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
On Thu, 20 Mar
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: George Getz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Libertarian statement on Iraq invasion
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:38:51 -0500
===
NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY
2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 100
Washington DC 20037
World
Libertarians are people who think the only legitimate use of state force
is to protect them from their slaves.
It is unlikely that people who don't oppose the death penalty, nor the
right of parents to beat their minor children at will, will care
particularly about Shrub kicking the crap out of
15 matches
Mail list logo
