Anonymous writes in favor of palladium arguing that it is optional, so
all is ok.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:15:21AM -0700, cypherpunk wrote:
> This is precisely the security model which has so many people upset:
> the system owner (the network admin) is giving up control over his
> machine, runni
At 11:47 AM 7/12/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
How secure can I make a Java sandbox from the rest of the network I'm on?
Can I make it so that my network administrator can't see what I'm typing?
In other words, a secure environment that's sitting on an insecure machine.
There's the "network" and
an insecure machine.
Although you asked about "Reverse Palladium" what you really want is
Palladium itself. This is precisely the security model which has so
many people upset: the system owner (the network admin) is giving up
control over his machine, running software which he cannot contr
Well not with java ...? Any keylogger would catch what you type; or
any mouse-logger could catch what you click.
You could either attempt to remove/bypass keyloggers with a
lower-level language, or type in code.
..
-- Michael
On 7/13/05, Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How secure can
How secure can I make a Java sandbox from the rest of the network I'm on?
Can I make it so that my network administrator can't see what I'm typing? In
other words, a secure environment that's sitting on an insecure machine.
And of course, there's a short term 'solution' (which will work until t
