Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-20 Thread Bill Frantz
At 1:04 PM -0800 2/14/03, Trei, Peter wrote: This comes from another mailing list. I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe. http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0212-07.htm FWIW - This speech was reprinted as an op-ed piece in today's

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-17 Thread Harmon Seaver
At least he's already opposing the unpatriot act II -- is anyone else? On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:30:16PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Declan McCullagh wrote: Most outspoken? Wellstone voted for the Patriot Act. How about Feingold, who was the lone dissenter, and is

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-16 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:50:46PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for any reason for that crash, eh?

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-16 Thread Declan McCullagh
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:58:07PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: That's no joke. Remember what happened to the most outspoken member of the Senate, Paul Wellstone. Funny they never came up for any reason for that crash, eh? Tried to blame it on the weather, but then all those other pilots

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-15 Thread Mike Rosing
The statement is real, it may not have been from the floor tho: http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_newsroom/byrd_news_feb/news_2003_february/news_2003_february_9.html Thanks, I'll send this to Feingold and see if he'll try to get a vote or motion going to force the executive to justify it's actions.

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-15 Thread Tim May
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 01:04 PM, Trei, Peter wrote: Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences by US Senator Robert Byrd Senate Floor Speech - Wednesday, February 12, 2003 To contemplate war is to think about the most horrible of human experiences. On this February

Re: Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-15 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Tim May wrote: About Byrd's speech, he is protected by the same Bush doctrine. If a less powerful person made these charges, he'd face a talking to by the FBI. And after PATRIOT II passes with an overwhelming majority, but after no debate, he'd

Supressed? speech by Sen. Robert Byrd -- Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences

2003-02-15 Thread Trei, Peter
This comes from another mailing list. I've confirmed that it's not been reported on by the NYT, the Washington Post, or the Boston Globe. Peter Trei -- From: Dave Farber[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:52 PM