On Tuesday 01 April 2003 08:50 pm, Neil Johnson wrote:
> When I went to work for the University I graduated from. I discovered all
> sorts of interesting things and even more when my sister enrolled.
>
At 09:36 AM 3/27/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 08:41 AM, John Kelsey wrote:
...
However, it seems to me it would be very hard for this news not to leak
out. If, say, a nuke or serious bioterror weapon had been found in a major
city, a lot of agencies would have had kno
John Kelsey wrote:
> I wasn't thinking of Al Qaida. There are a *lot* of people who might like
> to have a last-ditch deterrent against a US invasion or other action.
I can think of a few workable deterrents against US invasion:
- ICBMS
- an army with a reputation of fighting nastily when att
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 08:41 AM, John Kelsey wrote:
At 08:28 AM 3/26/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 06:12 PM 3/25/03 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
...
>Maybe the FBI caught them and disarmed the
>bombs before they went off.
And they didn't claim any credit? This doesn't jibe with t
At 08:28 AM 3/26/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 06:12 PM 3/25/03 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
...
>Maybe the FBI caught them and disarmed the
>bombs before they went off.
And they didn't claim any credit? This doesn't jibe with the puffery
one observes.
Well, there's puffery, and then there'
At 06:12 PM 3/25/03 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
>At 04:37 AM 3/25/03 +0100, Lucky Green wrote:
>...
>>If any terrorists had nukes, why have they not used them so far?
>
>Suppose you only have one, it was really hard to get, and you're not
sure
>how much of your US network has been turned, or at least
