Re: WebMoney

2005-04-25 Thread Bill Stewart
At 11:42 AM 4/23/2005, James A. Donald wrote: A procedure that was, of course, anonymous. You probably made a deposit in cash. Yes, of course :-) Writing a check would have been silly, and Goldage.net doesn't accept them for bank deposits, only for direct mailin. (They do accept bank wires, but

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-25 Thread James A. Donald
licy, which requires you to submit true name information, but really does not try at all for the most part, unless the shit hits the fan. Pecunix does not require true name information - merely an email account at which you are capable of receiving mail - preferably PGP mail. WebMoney does not ev

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-25 Thread Paweł Krawczyk
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:15:06AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > The fact that webmoney takes security so seriously suggests to me > > that they are honest - but, of course, the fact that they are russian > > suggests . > This isn't the middle of the Cold War a

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-22 Thread Bill Stewart
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote: > Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, so > not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it DOES mean it's unlikely > to bow to US pressure. Any online payment service that has a convenient mech

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-22 Thread Bill Stewart
At 07:40 PM 4/20/2005, James A. Donald wrote: Because webmoney takes security rather seriously, they do not accept credit card transactions, which is a major pain. Nor can you convert paypal to or from other internet moneys. Last time I wanted to use an online gold system, I used pecunix as the

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-22 Thread Tyler Durden
Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading to the words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerful force in Brooklyn these days. -TD From: "Shawn K. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WebMoney Date: Thu, 21

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-22 Thread Tyler Durden
ROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WebMoney Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:26:49 -0500 On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 13:44 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote: > Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading > to the > words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerf

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-22 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 13:44 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote: > Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading > to the > words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerful force in > Brooklyn > these days. Even if they are the Russian mob, they're a lot more trustworthy tha

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-21 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 19:40 -0700, James A. Donald wrote: > The fact that webmoney takes security so seriously suggests to me > that they are honest - but, of course, the fact that they are russian > suggests . This isn't the middle of the Cold War anymore. I don't

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-21 Thread James A. Donald
of them are located in Russia and > Ukraine. You can do transfers between webmoney and Pecunix, using http://exchange.net.ua, but it costs you about 3% each way. http://www.wmtransfer.com/ has you create a secret key, (at least in the classic version) which it signs. This enables you to do

RE: WebMoney

2005-04-20 Thread Marcel Popescu
gt; Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:23 PM > To: Marcel Popescu > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: WebMoney > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote: > > > Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, > so >

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-20 Thread Paweł Krawczyk
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote: > Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, so > not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it DOES mean it's unlikely > to bow to US pressure. Haven't used it personally yet but in Russia it seems

Re: WebMoney

2005-04-20 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Marcel Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, was there a black hole on this list, or am I the only one who isn't > receiving any messages? It seems to be working for me, just not much traffic lately. -- Riad S. Wahby [EMAIL PROTECTED]

WebMoney

2005-04-20 Thread Marcel Popescu
First, was there a black hole on this list, or am I the only one who isn't receiving any messages? Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, so not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it DOES mean it's unlikely to bow to US pressure. Any opinion? Thanks, Ma