[Because of its relevance and since most list members are probably not WSJ
subscribers, I've taken the liberty of posting the entire article. sds]
> From the Wall Street Journal --
>
>For Telecom Workers, Burst Of Bubble Takes Heavy Toll
>By REBECCA BLUMENSTEIN
>
>RICHARDSON, Texas -- Two years
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, John Kelsey wrote:
> Also, designing new crypto protocols, or analyzing old ones used in odd
> ways, is mostly useful for companies that are offering some new service on
> the net, or doing some wildly new thing. Many of the obvious new things
I agree with this as far as
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:46:09AM -0400, dmolnar wrote:
|
|
| On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, John Kelsey wrote:
|
| > Also, designing new crypto protocols, or analyzing old ones used in odd
| > ways, is mostly useful for companies that are offering some new service on
| > the net, or doing some wildly n
At 04:21 AM 8/16/02 -0400, dmolnar wrote:
...
>Don't forget schedule pressure, the overhead of bringing in a contractor
>to do crypto protocol design, and the not-invented-here syndrome. I think
>all of these contribute to keeping protocol design in-house, regardless of
>the technical skill of the
At 12:57 PM 8/16/02 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
...
>I've seen very high rates of unemployment among people of all walks of
>life in New York of late -- I know a lot of lawyers, systems
>administrators, secretaries, advertising types, etc. who are out of
>work or have been underemployed for a
Having devoted security personnel is a low priority at most companies.
General engineers will be tasked with figuring out how to incorporate
"security" and cryptography into products. I have visited many a company
where I am talking to a room full of very sharp engineers, but there is
a fundamenta
Hey, this is off-topic for DRM-punks! ;)
more seriously: I think the fundamental issue is that crypto doesn't
really solve many business problems, and it may solve fewer security
problems. See Bellovin's work on how many vulnerabilities would be
blocked by strong crypto. The buying public can't
Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any more definitive security industry stats? Are applied
> crypto people suffering higher rates of unemployment than general
> application programmers? (From my statistically too small sample of
> acquaintances it might appear so.)
Hard to say.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Adam Back wrote:
> failure to realise this issue or perhaps just not caring, or lack of
> financial incentives to care on the part of software developers.
> Microsoft is really good at this one. The number of times they
> re-used RC4 keys in different protocols is amazing!
On the employment situation... it seems that a lot of applied
cryptographers are currently unemployed (Tim Dierks, Joseph, a few
ex-colleagues, and friends who asked if I had any leads, the spate of
recent "security consultant" .sigs, plus I heard that a straw poll of
attenders at the codecon conf
10 matches
Mail list logo