Adam Back writes:
> Contrary to what article [2] claims FastTrack/Kazza really does blow
> Gnutella away, the supernode concept with high performance nodes
> elected to be search hubs makes all the difference. Gnutella last I
> tried it was barely functional for downloads, ~95% of downloads
> fai
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And gnutella is not able to resume a transfer that dies part way
>through which is very bad for download reliability. FastTrack/Kazza
>(but no longer Morpheus since the Kazza / Morpheus fall-out) on the
>other hand can resume,
On 28 Mar 2002 at 2:18, Adam Back wrote:
> And gnutella is not able to resume a transfer that dies part way
> through which is very bad for download reliability. FastTrack/Kazza
> (but no longer Morpheus since the Kazza / Morpheus fall-out) on the
> other hand can resume, and in fact do multiple
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:56:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got the impression (maybe wrong) that guntella as it exists is
> something much worse than a tree, that connections are
> pretty much haphazard and when you send out a query it reaches
> the same node by multiple paths, and tha
