On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:05:04AM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:03:28PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> > Well, of all the email lists I'm on, yours is the only posting
> > that does what it does on a group reply. Like, why doesn't my
> > "group" send a copy to you? A
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:18:25PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> > Declan's postings are usually either normal postings to cypherpunks
> > or else posted to his politech list (most of which have Subject: FC
> > something.) I'm subs
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:03:28PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Well, of all the email lists I'm on, yours is the only posting
> that does what it does on a group reply. Like, why doesn't my
> "group" send a copy to you? And why does it pick up
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and put it in the To: line? A
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Declan's postings are usually either normal postings to cypherpunks
> or else posted to his politech list (most of which have Subject: FC
> something.) I'm subscribed to politech, so I haven't had any
> weirdness when replying.
Yep.
At 8:53 AM -0800 on 2/4/03, Bill Stewart wrote:
> as opposed to Bob Hettinga's practice of copying everything to
> his usual sets of lists, most of which don't allow replies from
> non-subscribers.
Most of which I forward your answers on to, if that's any consolation.
Yes, Tim, I know, I'm an i
At 01:41 PM 02/03/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:23:58AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Do you mean that Steve's posts always do this to you?
> I've only seen one like that, and I assumed that Steve had simply
> Bcc:d the Cypherpunks list and some other lists on that pos
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:23:58AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 10:19 AM 02/03/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> > Looking at this more, I think it's two separate problems. I don't get the
> >"recipient list suppressed" or whatever it is from Declan's posts, it just
> >appears that something i
At 10:19 AM 02/03/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Looking at this more, I think it's two separate problems. I don't get the
"recipient list suppressed" or whatever it is from Declan's posts, it just
appears that something is wrong with the header, and it's probably something
minder.net is doing
