Re: [PATCH/FEATURE] Per-user XLIST support for cyrus-imapd

On 2013-04-30 09:20, Thomas Jarosch wrote: Hi Bron, On Tuesday, 30. April 2013 08:53:24 Bron Gondwana wrote: Hi - have you looked at all at the special-use support in mainline Cyrus? The xlist-* behaviour is planned to be removed, in favour of using the RFC 6154 mandated annotation. The

Re: Special-Use and Cyrus 2.5 git

On 2013-04-26 16:17, Bron Gondwana wrote: Is anybody actually using cyrus 2.5 git in production other than FastMail? Yes, though admittedly I should say production. I'm planning to do the mailboxes.db format changes before releasing 2.5, so that we don't have to support a stupid

Re: [PATCH] 2.4 branch does not build anymore

On 2013-05-18 16:34, Thomas Cataldo wrote: As conflict marks were committed. Thanks! Committed and pushed. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com m: +44 74 2516 3817 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08

Re: Changing LIST (again)

On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote: One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our implementation of every standard that we claim to support. This is why I emailed the list last week asking if anyone is using the intermediate SPECIALUSE representation in git. Since there

Re: Changing LIST (again)

On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote: One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our implementation of every standard that we claim to support. This is why I emailed the list last week asking

SETMETADATA: missing annotation value

Hi there, I'm wondering whether it is me (us) doing something wrong, or whether Cyrus IMAP git origin master HEAD is at fault... C: A0019 SETMETADATA INBOX (/shared/vendor/kolab/folder-type mail /private/vendor/kolab/folder-type mail.inbox) S: A0019 BAD Missing metadata value C: A0020

Re: Changing LIST (again)

On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of the INBOX) to in fact be created (while

Re: Changing LIST (again)

On 2013-05-19 21:45, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of