Hi,
There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack them
most efficiently. Eerily, someone at my job just committed something
that did just that. We have a custom defstruct, called defstruct-bv,
which allow
Neal Becker wrote:
> Martin C. Martin wrote:
>
>>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Apr 9, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Martin C. Martin wrote:
Hi,
There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack them
>
Martin C. Martin wrote:
>
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Martin C. Martin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
>>> transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack them
>>> most efficiently. Eerily
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Martin C. Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
>> transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack them
>> most efficiently. Eerily, someone at my job just committed so
On Apr 9, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Martin C. Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
> transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack
> them
> most efficiently. Eerily, someone at my job just committed something
> that did just that
Hi,
There's a potential optimization I mentioned on the Lisp inspired
transforms page, where you could reorder bitfields in order to pack them
most efficiently. Eerily, someone at my job just committed something
that did just that. We have a custom defstruct, called defstruct-bv,
which allows yo