Re: [Cython] CEP 513 - Unified Python and Cython namespaces

2008-04-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> > Just to clarify where you're coming from, where in Cython (as it is > now) would one every have to use c_numpy.ndarray (rather than using > numpy.ndarray everywhere)? From the land of big, bad unwarranted assumptions. I think this thought entered my head because of how all the numpy examp

Re: [Cython] CEP 513 - Unified Python and Cython namespaces

2008-04-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Apr 12, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> I added several comments. I'm not convinced it will make things >> clearer (or if it will muddy things up even more) but definitely >> food for thought. > Thanks, your comments definitely helped me seperate an

Re: [Cython] CEP 513 - Unified Python and Cython namespaces

2008-04-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I added several comments. I'm not convinced it will make things > clearer (or if it will muddy things up even more) but definitely food > for thought. Thanks, your comments definitely helped me seperate and present the concepts better. I renamed the page and moved some s

Re: [Cython] CEP 513 - Unified Python and Cython namespaces

2008-04-11 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I added several comments. I'm not convinced it will make things clearer (or if it will muddy things up even more) but definitely food for thought. - Robert On Apr 11, 2008, at 5:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > I know I said deal with this later, but because it potentially affects > type

[Cython] CEP 513 - Unified Python and Cython namespaces

2008-04-11 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
I know I said deal with this later, but because it potentially affects type parametrization syntax, perhaps deal with a few, small aspects of it soon. Wrote this (I've thought about this for about a month but didn't see a need to tell anyone about it until now...): http://wiki.cython.org/enhan