2013/3/5 Zaur Shibzukhov
>
> May be the safer strategy is to set nonecheck=True by default and allow
> locally to apply nonecheck(False) when developer believes that it is
> necessary?
>
Strategy of making nonecheck=True by default and setting explicitly
nonecheck=False when it's necessary is mo
2013/3/5 Stefan Behnel
> Zaur Shibzukhov, 05.03.2013 07:21:
> > In ExprNodes.py there are several places where method `as_none_safe_node`
> > was applied in order to wrap a node by NoneCheckNode.
> > I think it would be resonable to apply that mostly only in cases when
> > noncheck=True.
> >
> >
Zaur Shibzukhov, 05.03.2013 07:21:
> In ExprNodes.py there are several places where method `as_none_safe_node`
> was applied in order to wrap a node by NoneCheckNode.
> I think it would be resonable to apply that mostly only in cases when
> noncheck=True.
>
> Here are possible changes in ExprNodes
2013/3/5 Zaur Shibzukhov
> 2013/3/5 Zaur Shibzukhov
>
>> In ExprNodes.py there are several places where method `as_none_safe_node`
>> was applied in order to wrap a node by NoneCheckNode.
>> I think it would be resonable to apply that mostly only in cases when
>> noncheck=True.
>>
>> Here are po
2013/3/5 Zaur Shibzukhov
> In ExprNodes.py there are several places where method `as_none_safe_node`
> was applied in order to wrap a node by NoneCheckNode.
> I think it would be resonable to apply that mostly only in cases when
> noncheck=True.
>
> Here are possible changes in ExprNodes.py:
>
>
In ExprNodes.py there are several places where method `as_none_safe_node`
was applied in order to wrap a node by NoneCheckNode.
I think it would be resonable to apply that mostly only in cases when
noncheck=True.
Here are possible changes in ExprNodes.py:
https://github.com/intellimath/cython/comm
