Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Well, there's still the namespace of the argument type. I think it is
really a syntactic rewrite of
obj->foo(bar)
to
foo(obj, bar)
This is where I disagree. It's *not* just a syntactic rewrite,
it's a lot more than that.
With a Python method, I have a fairly go
Greg Ewing, 24.04.2012 00:32:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> I'm excited about Julia because it's basically what I'd *like* to program
>> in. My current mode of development for much stuff is Jinja2 or Tempita
>> used for generating C code; Julia would be a real step forward.
>
> It looks interes
On 04/24/2012 12:32 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
I'm excited about Julia because it's basically what I'd *like* to
program in. My current mode of development for much stuff is Jinja2 or
Tempita used for generating C code; Julia would be a real step forward.
It looks inter
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
I'm excited about Julia because it's basically what I'd *like* to
program in. My current mode of development for much stuff is Jinja2 or
Tempita used for generating C code; Julia would be a real step forward.
It looks interesting, but I have a few reservations abou
On 04/23/2012 08:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
I may be misuderstanding the intent here, but here it goes.
If the main idea is to be able to call functions that are written in
Julia or other languages, I think an effort to create an LLVM
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
> I may be misuderstanding the intent here, but here it goes.
>
> If the main idea is to be able to call functions that are written in
> Julia or other languages, I think an effort to create an LLVM backend
> for Cython would go a long way to
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Dimitri Tcaciuc wrote:
> I may be misuderstanding the intent here, but here it goes.
>
> If the main idea is to be able to call functions that are written in
> Julia or other languages, I think an effort to create an LLVM backend
> for Cython would go a long way t
I may be misuderstanding the intent here, but here it goes.
If the main idea is to be able to call functions that are written in
Julia or other languages, I think an effort to create an LLVM backend
for Cython would go a long way towards inter-language connections as
the one discussed here. It sho
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 22 April 2012 08:10, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> Yes, Julia looks really cool. It's been on my radar for a while, but I
>> haven't had a chance to really try it out for anything yet. But I
>> hadn't thought about low-level Python/Cython <
On 22 April 2012 08:10, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Yes, Julia looks really cool. It's been on my radar for a while, but I
> haven't had a chance to really try it out for anything yet. But I
> hadn't thought about low-level Python/Cython <-> Julia integration.
> That sounds very interesting. I wonder
Yes, Julia looks really cool. It's been on my radar for a while, but I
haven't had a chance to really try it out for anything yet. But I
hadn't thought about low-level Python/Cython <-> Julia integration.
That sounds very interesting. I wonder if Jython could give any
insight into to the tight inte
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 21.04.2012 07:27:
> Just heard about the Julia language and wanted to make sure it's on
> everybody's radar:
>
> http://julialang.org
>
> It's the first really decent language designed for scientists. Seems
> impressive to me, there's a few Cython features:
>
> - Dynamic t
On 04/21/2012 07:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Just heard about the Julia language and wanted to make sure it's on
everybody's radar:
http://julialang.org
It's the first really decent language designed for scientists. Seems
...that I've heard of, that is.
Dag
impressive to me, there's
13 matches
Mail list logo
