On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 08:49 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>
>> On 04/20/2012 08:21 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 20.04.2012 02:52:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:53 AM, mark florisson wrote:
>
> On 19 April
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 01:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought of some drawbacks of getfuncptr:
>>>
>>> - Important: Doesn't allow you to actually inspect the
mark florisson, 15.04.2012 20:59:
> Hopefully a final release candidate for the 0.16 release can be found
> here: http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.16 . This corresponds to
> the 'release' branch of the cython repository on github.
I pushed another couple of fixes related to the recent importl
Just heard about the Julia language and wanted to make sure it's on
everybody's radar:
http://julialang.org
It's the first really decent language designed for scientists. Seems
impressive to me, there's a few Cython features:
- Dynamic typing with optional static types
- Call C directly
A
On 04/21/2012 07:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Just heard about the Julia language and wanted to make sure it's on
everybody's radar:
http://julialang.org
It's the first really decent language designed for scientists. Seems
...that I've heard of, that is.
Dag
impressive to me, there's
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 21.04.2012 07:27:
> Just heard about the Julia language and wanted to make sure it's on
> everybody's radar:
>
> http://julialang.org
>
> It's the first really decent language designed for scientists. Seems
> impressive to me, there's a few Cython features:
>
> - Dynamic t