On 2011-04-21 08:59, Jesse Vincent wrote:
./Confiure
Srawberry?
--
Ruud
I built both 5.14.0-RC1 and 5.12.3 on a completely vanilla OpenBSD 4.8.
./Confiure -Dusethreads -des
I used this test script:
require POSIX;
use Test::More tests => 1;
my $new = POSIX::SigSet->new(&POSIX::SIGUSR1);
POSIX::sigprocmask(&POSIX::SIG_BLOCK, $new);
my $gotit
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
> Ugh, portable signal handling really does suck balls. I really don't
> have the time to look deeply into this right now, but I would suggest
> someone to port the test in question to C (should be fairly
> straightforward) and try to run it.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> This test has been hanging the test script on openbsd and mirbsd
> since it was added with commit 0c1bf4c7d433bb0ad80bfe5511b1301db32b7b95.
>
> The test in question does:
>
> require POSIX;
> my $new = POSIX::SigSet->new(&POSIX::SIGUSR
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:19:40PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:13:49PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > This test has been hanging the test script on openbsd and mirbsd
> > since it was added with commit 0c1bf4c7d433bb0ad80bfe5511b1301db32b7b95.
>
> > so somehow the si
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:13:49PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> This test has been hanging the test script on openbsd and mirbsd
> since it was added with commit 0c1bf4c7d433bb0ad80bfe5511b1301db32b7b95.
> so somehow the signal gets lost rather than just being temporarily blocked.
> Does anyone w
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Steven Schubiger wrote:
> Craig A. Berry wrote:
> > Got any details on that? Any chance it was caused by something recent
> > from this list:
>
> http://refcnt.homeunix.org/smoke/p5openbsd/511x/log5da6b59a91ad9679bcad4cba7615c78cd63d09f8.log
>
> $ ./per
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Steven Schubiger wrote:
> Automated smoke report for 5.13.11 patch
> 5da6b59a91ad9679bcad4cba7615c78cd63d09f8 v5.13.11-190-g5da6b59
> p5openbsd: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 256KB L2
> cache) (909 MHz) (i386/1 cpu)
> on openbsd -
Craig A. Berry wrote:
> Got any details on that? Any chance it was caused by something recent
> from this list:
http://refcnt.homeunix.org/smoke/p5openbsd/511x/log5da6b59a91ad9679bcad4cba7615c78cd63d09f8.log
$ ./perl -MTestInit t/op/sigdispatch.t
1..15
ok 1 - before the first loop
o
Automated smoke report for 5.13.11 patch
5da6b59a91ad9679bcad4cba7615c78cd63d09f8 v5.13.11-190-g5da6b59
p5openbsd: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache)
(909 MHz) (i386/1 cpu)
onopenbsd - 4.8
using cc version 4.2.1 20070719
smoketime 17 hours
10 matches
Mail list logo
