[darcs-devel] Re: build report: GNU/OpenSolaris

2007-07-06 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Attached are the logs I mentioned, and here is the footnote: [1] http://gnusolaris.org zooko.configure.log.rz Description: Binary data zooko.make_test.log.rz Description: Binary data zooko.make.log.rz Description: Binary data On Jul 6, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: Folks

[darcs-devel] build report: GNU/OpenSolaris

2007-07-06 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Folks: I just installed GNU/OpenSolaris [1] (pretty cool, eh?), and installed GHC 6.6.1, and built darcs 1.0.9. Attached are from configure, make, and make test. The tests didn't quite get full marks, I think, but darcs seems to work. Regards, Zooko

Re: [darcs-devel] Re: [darcs-users] darcs remove command

2007-07-06 Thread Allan Clark
Peter B. West wrote: Is your .bash_profile or .profile being executed? Is BASH_ENV set? Is support saying that, as a matter of policy, no per-user environment customisation is allowed for non-login non-interactive shell invocations? Hi Peter, thanks for the advice. We have quite a complic

Re: [darcs-devel] Re: [darcs-users] darcs remove command

2007-07-06 Thread Peter B. West
Allan Clark wrote: > Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>> But if you don't have the ability to change the default path (or move >>> the darcs executable into it) then this basically means you know what >>> the problem is but you can't solve it. >>> In my case I shouted (okay asked politely) at support but

Re: [darcs-devel] nolinks argument

2007-07-06 Thread Eric Y. Kow
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 01:45:03 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Also, would it be possible for darcs simply to detect those cases, and > > not create the links in those cases? > > The issue here is that Darcs linked files at a time when they were > readable by Alice, but Bob changed the perm

Re: [darcs-devel] nolinks argument

2007-07-06 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
[ Lots of good comments to justify --nolinks ] I'm sorry if I wasn't clear -- I think that --nolinks is a good idea, and in no way am I opposing it. I was just being pedantic about the scenario you described. Sorry for that, but I can't resist joining in when Alice and Bob are involved.

[darcs-devel] Re: [darcs-users] darcs remove command

2007-07-06 Thread Allan Clark
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: But if you don't have the ability to change the default path (or move the darcs executable into it) then this basically means you know what the problem is but you can't solve it. In my case I shouted (okay asked politely) at support but was met with "no" Allan, Y