On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:17:50 +, David Roundy wrote:
>> That's great to hear. BTW, you don't actually need to move that back,
>> as you can issue "darcs mv a b" *after* a "mv a b"... I still think
>> it's something [what originally asked] that can maybe be alleviated,
>> but not solved complet
New submission from gabriele renzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Using darcs in conjunction with other SCM without explicit import (i.e. I use
darcs on a project where the vendor/ directory contains an svn checkout) it is
difficult to keep track of file renames, because darcs sees a file rename
New submission from gabriele renzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
the new reporting facility is nice,. but there is one event that is not
reported:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/darcs$ darcs get http://fooa.hup
darcs failed: Not a repository: http://fooa.hup (Failed to download URL
http://fooa.hup/
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:43:44 -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> The third prerelease features (apart from numerous bug and performance
> regression fixes) a completely rewritten rollback command and new
> progress-reporting functionality. If darcs takes more than a couple of
> seconds for a given oper