[darcs-devel] [issue256] another bug in get_extra commuting patch: with example repos

2008-02-09 Thread Mark Stosberg
Per David's comments, this is considered resolved-in-unstable, although it can still be triggered with darcs-2 when run against repos that were originally created with darcs 1 and the old repo format. -- status: duplicate - resolved-in-unstable __ Darcs

Re: [darcs-devel] [issue256] another bug in get_extra commuting patch: with example repos

2008-01-11 Thread Tristan Seligmann
* David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-11 12:42:31 -0500]: Well, currently the conversion to darcs-2 requires a bottleneck, in which only *one* repository is converted (i.e. all other branches get lopped off). I think this is reasonable, as the transition to darcs-2 is always going to

Re: [darcs-devel] [issue256] another bug in get_extra commuting patch: with example repos

2008-01-11 Thread David Roundy
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:43:13PM +0200, Tristan Seligmann wrote: * David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-11 12:42:31 -0500]: Well, currently the conversion to darcs-2 requires a bottleneck, in which only *one* repository is converted (i.e. all other branches get lopped off). I think

[darcs-devel] [issue256] another bug in get_extra commuting patch: with example repos

2006-09-01 Thread Attila Lendvai
New submission from Attila Lendvai [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/ucw_ajax.clean$ darcs pull --no-set-default ../ucw_dev.clean darcs-bin: bug in get_extra commuting patch: Thu Aug 10 00:55:57 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Refactored checkbox-field to use a hidden input and do not