On 9/11/06, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 14:17:30 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Although I hadn't mentioned it yet, I was actually hoping that at some
> point in the distance future we may extend the IO monad to carry
> around some extra details and at that time lo
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 14:17:30 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Although I hadn't mentioned it yet, I was actually hoping that at some
> point in the distance future we may extend the IO monad to carry
> around some extra details and at that time logStr could be updated to
> read the opts from an envi
On 9/11/06, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'd rather avoid putting an Int into verbose, as in my experience this
> >makes it hard to keep consistent levels of verbosity than otherwise.
> >I'd go with something more like
I have no opinion on whether having multiple levels of verbosity
> >I'd rather avoid putting an Int into verbose, as in my experience this
> >makes it hard to keep consistent levels of verbosity than otherwise.
> >I'd go with something more like
I have no opinion on whether having multiple levels of verbosity is a
good thing or not.
If we were to implement suc
On 9/11/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 04:12:28PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was working on the darcs source today and I realized that in a lot
> of ways the current logging output is poor. Mostly we don't have
> enough of it.
>
> Here are some
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 04:12:28PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was working on the darcs source today and I realized that in a lot
> of ways the current logging output is poor. Mostly we don't have
> enough of it.
>
> Here are some changes I started making:
>
> 1) In DarcsFlags chan
On 9/11/06, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do people think?
What actual problem are you trying to solve?
To quote myself:
I was working on the darcs source today and I realized that in a lot
of ways the current logging output is poor. Mostly we don't have
enough of it.
> What do people think?
What actual problem are you trying to solve?
Juliusz
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
Hello,
I was working on the darcs source today and I realized that in a lot
of ways the current logging output is poor. Mostly we don't have
enough of it.
Here are some changes I started making:
1) In DarcsFlags change Verbose | Quiet to Verbose Int. The
understanding would be that Verbose 0
