> Sun Aug 20 02:40:24 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Fix issue 185: don't combine AddFile and RmFile in the same patch
Already committed in the *unstable* branch (you appear to be working
with the stable one).
Juliusz
__
Sun Aug 20 02:40:24 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix issue 185: don't combine AddFile and RmFile in the same patch
For unknown reason (a possibly previous version of) darcs allows a
single patch to Add and Remove the same file in a single patch. The
"changes" command used to combine them
> Now the question is: what's better, amending my change and resend a
> new patch, or recording this fix a sending an additional patch with
> the correct condition?
Please send a new patch.
Juliusz
___
darcs-deve
This is the amended patch, with the correct condition, as explained in
my previous message. Of course, if the previous patch has been already
applied, I can easily send a new fix-to-fix patch instead.
Sorry for the noise.
Sun Aug 20 02:40:24 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix issue 185: don't co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hunk ./PatchViewing.lhs 173
- | f == f' = combine ((f,a.+a',b.+b',r+r',isd,c||c'):ss)
+ -- Don't combine AddFile and RmFile: (maybe an old revision of)
darcs
+ -- allows a single patch to add and remove the same file, see
issue 185
> Sat Aug 19 19:54:49 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Fix issue 185: don't combine AddFile and RmFile in the same patch
> For unknown reason (a possibly previous version of) darcs allows a
> single patch to Add and Remove the same file in a single patch. The
> "changes" command used to co
Sat Aug 19 19:54:49 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix issue 185: don't combine AddFile and RmFile in the same patch
For unknown reason (a possibly previous version of) darcs allows a
single patch to Add and Remove the same file in a single patch. The
"changes" command used to combine them
