Re: [darcs-devel] darcs patch: posthook success/failure messages with -... (and 1 more)

2006-03-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> It's been so long since I submitted that patch that I think I deleted > the copy of the repository with those changes. You'll find your original patch on http://thread.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Juliusz ___

Re: [darcs-devel] darcs patch: posthook success/failure messages with -... (and 1 more)

2006-03-01 Thread Jason Dagit
On 3/1/06, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * issue79 fix, whats -l no longer computes full patch for new files > > Jason, > > Please remove the old version of diff_added rather than just > commenting it out. I'll be glad to apply this patch when you do. Juliusz, It's been so

Re: [darcs-devel] darcs patch: posthook success/failure messages with -... (and 1 more)

2006-03-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> * issue79 fix, whats -l no longer computes full patch for new files Jason, Please remove the old version of diff_added rather than just commenting it out. I'll be glad to apply this patch when you do. Juliusz

[darcs-devel] darcs patch: posthook success/failure messages with -... (and 1 more)

2006-01-13 Thread Jason Dagit
Juliusz, This is a resend. I'm not sure if you'll want to apply the issue79 fix. It certainly helped on my system, but I strongly feel that it needs reviewed by someone that knows darcs better and maybe it needs some real world testing. Do we have an experimental branch that is just used for