On Thursday, 3 May 2018 21:09:59 CEST KOVÁCS István wrote:
> 'Something more lightweight?'
restructedtext, which is what a lot of projects use to write documentation
e.g. using sphinx or pandoc.
> What about Github pages and
> https://github.com/yakivmospan/github-wikito-converter
> 'allows you
'Something more lightweight?'
What about Github pages and
https://github.com/yakivmospan/github-wikito-converter
'allows you to generate HTML & PDF documentation from your Github wiki or
any other markdown-based wiki.'
>
>
On Thursday, 3 May 2018 19:05:59 CEST Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le jeudi 03 mai 2018 à 18:41 +0200, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> > Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer
> > > Docbook
Le jeudi 03 mai 2018 à 18:41 +0200, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc:
> > Hello,
> >
> > are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook
> > 5.x?
>
> That sounds like an awful lot of work. Is there anything
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc:
> Hello,
>
> are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook
> 5.x?
That sounds like an awful lot of work. Is there anything special we would get
from that?
> Pierre
Tobias
signature.asc
Description:
Hello,
are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook
5.x?
Pierre
___
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
