Hi Björn,
many thanks for your feedback.
Am 10.11.18 um 11:24 schrieb Björn Sozumschein:
I also believe that a proper explanation would prevent confusion
regarding the inversion behavior.
However, I have concerns with respect to the usability, based on my
initial experience:
In most cases, I
hehe, i wouldn't post backtraces from anything but <10min old git, would i :)
i think the last people who touched this are houz and parafin, around
where the module->init() call takes place. the last line in the
backtrace is probably a red herring, the problem is that rawprepare's
init() function
hi!
looks like an interesting project you're working on.
if you have a look at the source of darktable-cli, it's really short:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/cli/main.c
you could probably link your code directly to libdarktable.so the same
way. i don't understand
Sorry for the noise I see the Git sha1 in the first line of the
backtrace :)
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
Hi Johannes,
> just so i don't lose track of it. i just got this crash (see attached).
With which version?
The backtrace crash here src/common/image.c:112, but this is:
const char *dt_non_raw_extensions[]
= { ".jpeg", ".jpg", ...
So I'm asking.
Thanks,
--
Pascal Obry / Magny
heya,
just so i don't lose track of it. i just got this crash (see attached).
what happens is that for some obscure reason, we need a module_t (not
only module_so_t) when updating legacy blendop params in old presets.
i happen to have one for rawprepare (which is called "debug dng" so i
don't
Hi Heiko,
at first, the feathering using a guide filter works really great!
I've tried it with a recent portrait shooting and it delivers awesome
results for applying edits to the head independently from the background.
I also believe that a proper explanation would prevent confusion regarding
