* Patrick Shanahan [04-02-20 14:13]:
> * Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 07:49]:
> > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 13:37:38 CEST Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
> > > > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> > > > > Thanks Patrick Shanahan a
* Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 07:49]:
> On Thursday, 2 April 2020 13:37:38 CEST Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
> > > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> > > > Thanks Patrick Shanahan and Parafin. I have fallen back to 0.3.2, and I
>
Bear in mind that some distributions ship with 0.3.95 now e.g. Archlinux. I've
had to downgrade and compile manually.
On 2 April 2020 12:37:38 BST, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>* Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
>> On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
>> > Thanks Patri
I have successfully compiled it on tumbleweed (just a couple of hours ago) by
simply
falling back to lensfun 0.3.2.
On 4/2/20 1:37 PM Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
> > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> > > Thanks Patrick Shanahan
On Thursday, 2 April 2020 13:37:38 CEST Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
> > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> > > Thanks Patrick Shanahan and Parafin. I have fallen back to 0.3.2, and I
> > > second the opinion that it would probably
* Andreas Schneider [04-02-20 02:27]:
> On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> > Thanks Patrick Shanahan and Parafin. I have fallen back to 0.3.2, and I
> > second the opinion that it would probably be best to simply kill the 0.3.95
> > preprocessor directive.
>
> https
On Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:10:54 CEST Hossam Elgabarty wrote:
> Thanks Patrick Shanahan and Parafin. I have fallen back to 0.3.2, and I
> second the opinion that it would probably be best to simply kill the 0.3.95
> preprocessor directive.
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/790678
--
Andr
Thanks Patrick Shanahan and Parafin. I have fallen back to 0.3.2, and I second
the opinion
that it would probably be best to simply kill the 0.3.95 preprocessor directive.
On 4/1/20 5:07 PM parafin wrote:
> You shouldn't use this version anyway:
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issue
And you could also check that ones:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/2901
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/2793
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/2332
Lensfun 0.3.95 is not considered as a stable version so not supported by
darktable.
The only thi
You shouldn't use this version anyway:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/2813
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:16:46 -0400
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Hossam Elgabarty [04-01-20 10:05]:
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > Many thanks for the great work!
> >
> > I am recently having trouble bui
* Hossam Elgabarty [04-01-20 10:05]:
> Dear developers,
>
> Many thanks for the great work!
>
> I am recently having trouble building darktable, the problem starts with
> iop/lens.cc when a
> call to lfModifier constructur is made:
>
> */home/hossam/.programs/darktable/src/iop/lens.cc:365:60:
Dear developers,
Many thanks for the great work!
I am recently having trouble building darktable, the problem starts with
iop/lens.cc when a
call to lfModifier constructur is made:
*/home/hossam/.programs/darktable/src/iop/lens.cc:365:60:* *error: *no matching
function for call to ‘*lfModifie
12 matches
Mail list logo
