Re: Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-28 Thread openHAB . Doc
I would like to take up the "old" topic again because I have in the meantime worked myself into the docbook 5 topic. The adaptations of the individual XML documents are manageable, the header is adapted as follows e.g. (darktable.xml):                                      %darktable_ent;    

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-05 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2018, 15:41:05 CEST schrieb Moritz Mœller (The Ritz): > On May 3, 2018 11:24:52 PM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Thursday, 3 May 2018 21:09:59 CEST KOVÁCS István wrote: > 'Something more lightweight?' > > restructedtext, which is what a lot of projects

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-04 Thread The Ritz
On May 3, 2018 11:24:52 PM Andreas Schneider wrote: On Thursday, 3 May 2018 21:09:59 CEST KOVÁCS István wrote: 'Something more lightweight?' restructedtext, which is what a lot of projects use to write documentation e.g. using sphinx or pandoc. +1. Use Spinx (which is

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Thursday, 3 May 2018 21:09:59 CEST KOVÁCS István wrote: > 'Something more lightweight?' restructedtext, which is what a lot of projects use to write documentation e.g. using sphinx or pandoc. > What about Github pages and > https://github.com/yakivmospan/github-wikito-converter > 'allows you

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread KOVÁCS István
'Something more lightweight?' What about Github pages and https://github.com/yakivmospan/github-wikito-converter 'allows you to generate HTML & PDF documentation from your Github wiki or any other markdown-based wiki.' > >

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Thursday, 3 May 2018 19:05:59 CEST Pascal Obry wrote: > Le jeudi 03 mai 2018 à 18:41 +0200, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > > Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc: > > > Hello, > > > > > > are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer > > > Docbook

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread Pascal Obry
Le jeudi 03 mai 2018 à 18:41 +0200, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc: > > Hello, > > > > are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook > > 5.x? > > That sounds like an awful lot of work. Is there anything

Re: [darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2018, 16:58:04 CEST schrieb openhab.doc: > Hello, > > are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook > 5.x? That sounds like an awful lot of work. Is there anything special we would get from that? > Pierre Tobias signature.asc Description:

[darktable-dev] considerations to port the documentation to Docbook 5.x

2018-05-03 Thread openhab.doc
Hello, are there any considerations to port the documentation to the newer Docbook 5.x? Pierre ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org