Re: [darktable-devel] masks and blending

Am 04.05.2013 22:52, schrieb Ger Siemerink: > Ulrich, > > is it possible to add a textbox when hovering above the eye icon > after 1 shapes used, see attached image? > Not quite sure. The eye icon is produced by a special property of the combobox left (it's called a "quad"). AFAIK there is current

Re: [darktable-devel] masks and blending

a text box/ballon saying something like "show mask" 2013/5/4 Ger Siemerink > Ulrich, > > is it possible to add a textbox when hovering above the eye icon > after 1 shapes used, see attached image? > > [image: Inline afbeelding 1] > > regards Ger > > 2013/5/4 Ulrich Pegelow > >> Am 22.04.2013 1

Re: [darktable-devel] masks and blending

Ulrich, is it possible to add a textbox when hovering above the eye icon after 1 shapes used, see attached image? [image: Inline afbeelding 1] regards Ger 2013/5/4 Ulrich Pegelow > Am 22.04.2013 15:49, schrieb johannes hanika: > > hi, > > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:50 PM, AlicVB >

Re: [darktable-devel] masks and blending

Am 22.04.2013 15:49, schrieb johannes hanika: > hi, > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:50 PM, AlicVB > wrote: > > Hi Ulrich. > First thanks for your comments :) > > about the mask line in the module, I agree it's actual position is not > optimal, but I don't ag

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: > On 05/04/2013 06:18 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: >> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, calca wrote: >>> I think it's possibile to change whitout problems ;) >> >> Done: >> >> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/e1cae3bcee923a88b95

Re: [darktable-devel] Error during Git compile / Ubuntu Raring / solved

On 05/04/2013 11:08 AM, johannes hanika wrote: > pushed the patch in the ticket (works with old exr, too). please shout if > 2.0 still causes problems. Thanks works for all releases of openSUSE Togan -- Get 100% visibil

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

On 05/04/2013 06:18 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, calca wrote: >> I think it's possibile to change whitout problems ;) > > Done: > > https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/e1cae3bcee923a88b95a3276af26cd3214b7b9cd Thanks These three misses your TLC as

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, calca wrote: > I think it's possibile to change whitout problems ;) Done: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/e1cae3bcee923a88b95a3276af26cd3214b7b9cd Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ---

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

I think it's possibile to change whitout problems ;) --g On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, calca > wrote: > > Hi Togan, > > > > I just copy/pasted an XML example for gobject... > > > > As pascal suggest, why need to change? > > Because I

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, calca wrote: > Hi Togan, > > I just copy/pasted an XML example for gobject... > > As pascal suggest, why need to change? Because ISO-8859-1 is pretty much universally deprecated? Regards, Pascal de Bruijn --

Re: [darktable-devel] Sigma Lens Correction

are you maybe looking at jpg images which have already been corrected in camera and now the correction is applied twice? j. On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:23 AM, David Vincent-Jones wrote: > darktable 1.3+107~g018e4f1 ... 64 bit > > I am getting significant 'pincushioning' (negative barrel) with the

[darktable-devel] Sigma Lens Correction

darktable 1.3+107~g018e4f1 ... 64 bit I am getting significant 'pincushioning' (negative barrel) with the default settings for the Sigma 17-70mm. f2.8-4.5 DC Macro. With lens correction turned off edge verticals look correct but there is a well defined inward bow when the correction is turned on

Re: [darktable-devel] Error during Git compile / Ubuntu Raring / solved

pushed the patch in the ticket (works with old exr, too). please shout if 2.0 still causes problems. j. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Togan Muftuoglu < tog...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 04/30/2013 11:54 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Togan Muftuoglu

Re: [darktable-devel] Noise profiles for Sony SLT-A57

cool, thanks. numbers are very close to your last version, maybe the gaussian part (sensor heat etc) is a little different now. commited, jo On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Baptiste Pierrat wrote: > Correction: commas instead of tabs in the presets.txt file. > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:08

Re: [darktable-devel] Fwd: Re: Noise profiles Oly E-1, E-3 and EP-2 and a profile usage question.

hey, those profiles look okay (e-1 is good, e-p2 seems to do some in-camera magic that invalidates our assumptions somewhat, so dark areas might be sub-optimal, e-3 has a broken blue channel which doesn't matter so much currently. i zeroed it out). cheers, jo On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:00 PM,

Re: [darktable-devel] Noise Profile for Nikon D7100

sorry, but these curves don't match the data (probably something about exposure, too dark i would say). see the attached image. the flat green line should actually follow the noisy green curve very closely. -jo On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Stefan Wimmer wrote: > > I tried to create denois

Re: [darktable-devel] sensor profiling Olympus E-520

committed now. numbers were really a little different. thx, jo On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Daniel Schury wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Not sure if my last mail got through: I redid the profiling and now the > benchmark returns reasonable results: > 100.pfm

Re: [darktable-devel] Noise Profile for Pentax K-30

cool, thanks for that, committed. sorry for the delay.. j. On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Wolfgang Renz wrote: > hi, > > I tried to denoise some more real life pictures with the presets I sent > before. > Since I wasn't completely satiesfied I repeated the profiling procedure. > > According t

Re: [darktable-devel] Styles output encoding

Hi Togan, I just copy/pasted an XML example for gobject... As pascal suggest, why need to change? cheers, --g On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Togan Muftuoglu < tog...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 05/03/2013 05:59 PM, calca wrote: > > Hi, > > > > no, no specific reason about that ;) > >