Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread David Vincent-Jones
Tobias; . Thanks for clarifying that ... all a bit confusing. Nice hardware, unfortunate sensor decision. David On 13-12-08 01:39 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2013, 12:34:23 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: Tobias; This is the pair that I used. http://www.dpreview.co

[darktable-devel] Still not optimal pixelpipes processing with OpenCL enabled, findings & feature requests

2013-12-08 Thread suni
Hi all, I spent couple of hours trying to find how image processing in various dt pixelpipes is distributed between the available opencl devices (one in my case) and the CPU non-opencl device in darkroom mode. The reason for this investigation was that I saw in the -d opencl -d perf output that th

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2013, 12:34:23 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > Tobias; > > This is the pair that I used. > > http://www.dpreview.com/articles/1887029702/capture-one-fujifilm-x-trans-raw > -support-tested I tested locally, and as I thought, it's GraphicsMagic converting the fie via dcraw.

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread David Vincent-Jones
Tobias; This is the pair that I used. http://www.dpreview.com/articles/1887029702/capture-one-fujifilm-x-trans-raw-support-tested David On 13-12-08 12:22 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2013, 10:47:47 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: Well ... this is even more interesting. I

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2013, 10:47:47 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > Well ... this is even more interesting. > > I downloaded two test images from dpreview, a normal city scene as well > as one of their color/resolution test shots and put them into a fresh > folder. > > This was my terminal resp

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! David Vincent-Jones writes: > Well ... this is even more interesting. > > I downloaded two test images from dpreview, a normal city scene as well as one > of their color/resolution test shots and put them into a fresh folder. > > This was my terminal response: > david@W530:~/darktable/

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread David Vincent-Jones
Well ... this is even more interesting. I downloaded two test images from dpreview, a normal city scene as well as one of their color/resolution test shots and put them into a fresh folder. This was my terminal response: david@W530:~/darktable/build/src$ darktable -d [rawspeed] No decoder fou

Re: [darktable-devel] Mass Storage Camera

2013-12-08 Thread johannes hanika
heya, i would think both of that are gphoto related things (double camera entry, and the non-translatable string is probably just the name of the camera we get from the library). j. On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Ger Siemerink wrote: > Hi all, > > Question, is it only me having that module t

Re: [darktable-devel] Noise Profile for E-M1

2013-12-08 Thread johannes hanika
yes, noise profiles are uncritical wrt new bugs, it's just new data. so no problem to put them into the release. -jo On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Steven Adler wrote: > Works great! Will this make it in 1.4? > hey, > > thanks for the profiles, these look spot on, i'll push to git. > > can y

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Samstag, 7. Dezember 2013, 18:59:39 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > Soren; Not sure what is going on here . > > I downloaded another raw xpro-1 file and tried to open it on my 32 bit > machine (also Xubuntu 13.10) running today's GIT. I got nothing but > 'skulls'. > The same file moved onto

Re: [darktable-devel] Fuji x pro 1 raw

2013-12-08 Thread S. Witt
Am 08.12.2013 03:59, schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > Soren; Not sure what is going on here . > > I downloaded another raw xpro-1 file and tried to open it on my 32 bit > machine (also Xubuntu 13.10) running today's GIT. I got nothing but > 'skulls'. > The same file moved onto my 64 bit machin