Hi,
I have had the same experience. For me it seems to be related to
enabling denoise (profiled). With denoise enabled export takes
~50s or more, without ~4s per image. I think this is to be
expected. Although having said that, I've had a few occasions
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
> 1) A thumbnail mipmap cache, limited to a fixed max image size (say
> 640x480) that gets calculated on-demand and never deleted. All these
> mipmaps are stored to disk and a part of them is brought to memory as
> needed to display.
> 2) A f
Hi all,
(First apologies if you've received twice email twice).
I've been using darktable for over a year since about v0.9 and love it.
Never had any issues. However since two weeks ago it has really become
unstable or almost unusble when exporting jpegs. Haven't previously been
on the mailing
Hi Johannes,
it would just be an option to tick so that the eye tracking device is used
to change UI reactions (hide panels when you don't look at them for
instance).
My issue is that there's no standard yet as regards eye tracking APIs, so I
would hook to one from a specific vendor (not on a drive
On 04/02/2014 08:34 AM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
The proposal is to divide the cache into two:
1) A thumbnail mipmap cache, limited to a fixed max image size (say
640x480) that gets calculated on-demand and never deleted. All these
mipmaps are stored to disk and a part of them is brought to memor
Hi everyone,
Here's a proposal on how to improve darktable's caching. What this is
trying to solve is:
- The lighttable view is very slow at showing thumbnails for
collections larger than the cache (see bug #9884). In fact it will
thrash the whole cache while doing it.
- To get full-size images i
heya,
not sure i understand the question. you're planning to write a module for
some special hardware? including drivers?
-jo
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Benjamin Lefaudeux <
benjamin.lefaud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> congrats first for all the work you did on Darktable, awesom
Hi everyone,
congrats first for all the work you did on Darktable, awesome, it has been
my RAW processing software of choice for some time now.. .
I have a small question as regards your policy with respect to vendor
specific APIs : I was planning on testing a UI modification in the field of
eye-tr
Hello Peter,
thats a known issue which will be fixed in a future release if the
internal scheduling has been rewritten. At moment there is no quick fix
planned/possible (according to this list and freenode#darktable)
Regards,
Markus
Am 02.04.2014 01:10, schrieb Peter Martischka / 马彼得:
> Hi every
