Hallöchen!
Sebastian Kraft writes:
> Am 23.09.2014 um 07:53 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I don't see an actual difference between returning 1.6e16, inf,
>> or nan. The caller has to special-handle it in either case.
>
> No, the caller should not have to handle these cases. [...]
>
>
Am 23.09.2014 um 07:53 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
> Hallöchen!
>
> johannes hanika writes:
>
>> if lf returns this magic error value sometimes, maybe it's just a
>> matter of fixing the branch that results in this special
>> treatment? i think it should be lf's responsibility not to
>> randomly retur
