Hello,
I still cannot build 1.1.1 keep having the same error message where glib
version cannot be read (returns blank version number, even though it is
there, installed and with a version more that adequate, as previous checks
have proven)
if anyone as a clue why the version string would be empty
Jo, Tobias,
Just downloaded rc2 and I still have this issue:
I cannot build DT as the glib version is not detected.
On 5 November 2012 22:28, Didier Gasser-Morlay wrote:
> >Let's try to find the source of the problem. We already know that
> pkg-config
> >works and that
>Let's try to find the source of the problem. We already know that
pkg-config
>works and that it finds the correct version. Maybe something about cmake is
>broken.
>Please create a new directory, put the attached CMakeLists.txt and
>LibFindMacros.cmake into that directory. Next cd into the directo
On 4 November 2012 23:41, johannes hanika wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Didier Gasser-Morlay
> wrote:
> >>Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 12:32:38 schrub Didier Gasser-Morlay:
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>> oops, you're right;
>Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 12:32:38 schrub Didier Gasser-Morlay:
>
>[...]
>
>> oops, you're right; it is there and it's output is 2.31.16; which is
very
>> confusing as the package does not indicaqte this;
>>
>> Not sure why this time round th
Am Samstag, 3. November 2012, 23:57:21 schrub Didier Gasser-Morlay:
> > this is the message I am getting :
> >
> > "Glib version check failed. Version was found, at least version 2.24 is
> > required"
> >
> > 1- apparently the version c
> this is the message I am getting :
>
> "Glib version check failed. Version was found, at least version 2.24 is
> required"
>
> 1- apparently the version check does not work or the message is missing a
> placeholder
>There seems to be a problem with your glib installation. What is >the
output of
this is the message I am getting :
"Glib version check failed. Version was found, at least version 2.24 is
required"
1- apparently the version check does not work or the message is missing a
placeholder
2- is 2.24 really necessary ? 1.0.5 did not have this requirement and
was happily working wi
