On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:27 AM, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> I used a fairly normal scene for this test (not sure why but I put it
> totally out of focus). There was a fairly good dynamic range visible.
>
> When the image was imported into dt I only changed the raw basecurve into
> the lineal stat
Hallöchen!
David Vincent-Jones writes:
> [...]
>
> The image that I used probably had a better grey distribution than
> samples previously offered on this subject ... however I will
> remake based on a much more normal scene.
I have never smoothed, yet my plots only looked this way for rare
grey
On 13-09-06 07:49 PM, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> David Vincent-Jones writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> A plot that is typical of my findings are attached. Note: the
>> absence of some of the 256 values causes the variation and I have
>> not attempted any smoothing.
> Your analysis that some va
Hallöchen!
David Vincent-Jones writes:
> [...]
>
> A plot that is typical of my findings are attached. Note: the
> absence of some of the 256 values causes the variation and I have
> not attempted any smoothing.
Your analysis that some values occur very rarely is probably
correct. This *may* ma
I decided to revisit the basecurve question prior to making any
modifications on my system. The tests were made using a Canon 50D camera
shooting a raw/jpg combination. I did have full dynamic range in the raw
file.
I extracted 256 test values (0 -255) from the raw file and compared them
to t
