On 19.12.2012 14:38, Emre Meydan wrote:
> Thanks. Is there a command that simply generates a database directly
> from a presets.txt file? (without re-processing the photos?).
There is none currently. But if you kept the directory with your RAW
images and the generated files, just re-run the comman
>
> or even simpler, `git pull' the latest denoise branch and do that:
>
> ~/darktable/tools/noise/gen-profile -d /dir/where/your/shots/are
>
> and it will create a library.db with the presets in them for you to
> test (instructions when the script finishes).
>
> thx to dumbbell, no more recompile
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Emre Meydan wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> If the important thing is how closely the curves follow sigma=1 in "flat
> noise levels" graphs, then one of my earlier photo shoots actually seems to
> be better -- the curves follow 1 more tightly with less fluctuation:
> htt
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Roumano wrote:
> Le mardi 18 d�cembre 2012 à 14:33 +0100, Emre Meydan a écrit :
>> Hi Johannes,
>>
>>
>> If the important thing is how closely the curves follow sigma=1 in
>> "flat noise levels" graphs, then one of my earlier photo shoots
>> actually seems to be be
Thanks Christian! Can you also test this last preset and report whether
it's better or worse?
...
emre
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Roumano wrote:
> Le mardi 18 d�cembre 2012 à 14:33 +0100, Emre Meydan a écrit :
> > Hi Johannes,
> >
> >
> > If the important thing is how closely the curves
Le mardi 18 d�cembre 2012 à 14:33 +0100, Emre Meydan a écrit :
> Hi Johannes,
>
>
> If the important thing is how closely the curves follow sigma=1 in
> "flat noise levels" graphs, then one of my earlier photo shoots
> actually seems to be better -- the curves follow 1 more tightly with
> less fl
Hi Johannes,
If the important thing is how closely the curves follow sigma=1 in "flat
noise levels" graphs, then one of my earlier photo shoots actually seems to
be better -- the curves follow 1 more tightly with less fluctuation:
http://emremeydan.com/tempor/550d-denoise_02.tar.gz
Do you think t
hey
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Emre Meydan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know somebody else was working on a profile for this camera, but i also
> wanted to try it myself.
>
> I had to make three different sets of shoots before i got a nice profile.
> What i tried last (and what seemed to work) was to
Hi Again,
Excuse me, i sayed a big mistake :
After johannes add my merge, i have redone new preset (but it's wasn't
merge as johannes sayed :
>you sure these are better? the blue channel is still misbehaving a
>little, and the curve fit for iso 100 seems to be off a little (see
>iso100.pdf, how
Hi Roumano,
I actually haven't tried your presets yet -- will do, and report whether i
see any difference or not. But it makes sense that they should be behaving
similarly :)
My shots aren't perfect either, i'm planning on trying once again. I'm
waiting for a sunny day to get more contrast and cl
Hi Emre,
I have take the first shoot from the 550d, but i known my shoot are far
from perfect...
I have planned to improve this, but you pass me ;)
I have compiled a test version with both preset, i can't see any real
difference between them. (tested on iso 800 1600 & 3200)
johannes, can you lo
Hi,
I know somebody else was working on a profile for this camera, but i also
wanted to try it myself.
I had to make three different sets of shoots before i got a nice profile.
What i tried last (and what seemed to work) was to shoot the window of my
room: the sky was overexposed, while the shado
12 matches
Mail list logo
