On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Markus Jung wrote:
> Am 21.12.2012 20:34, schrieb Pascal de Bruijn:
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>>> Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012, 15:07:36 schrub Pascal de Bruijn:
Hi,
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
It seems that we are currently movi
Am 21.12.2012 20:34, schrieb Pascal de Bruijn:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012, 15:07:36 schrub Pascal de Bruijn:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>> It seems that we are currently moving our XMP data verbatim into
>>> exported files, even thought
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012, 15:07:36 schrub Pascal de Bruijn:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi.
>
>> It seems that we are currently moving our XMP data verbatim into
>> exported files, even thought most of the data in that XMP has no added
>> value for e
Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012, 15:07:36 schrub Pascal de Bruijn:
> Hi,
Hi.
> It seems that we are currently moving our XMP data verbatim into
> exported files, even thought most of the data in that XMP has no added
> value for exported files.
We do that on purpose so you know what you did to get
Hi,
It seems that we are currently moving our XMP data verbatim into
exported files, even thought most of the data in that XMP has no added
value for exported files.
It would make sense to clean this up to some extent. And I've been
doing an attempt at this, and my code does compile, however it d