Well, I don't think so. For me, the lighttable is a good way to review
my pictures, give ratings and also to maybe sort them out. If I always
have to go to the darkroom to verify if the picture is sharp or not and
then need to go back to lighttable to give a rating, thats not good. And
as far a
Le 306 déc. 2013 10:iviyg, johannes hanika a écrit :
>nuits 6hul6
> httpt://djj7j/usermanual/
D.⅞+&⅞7(6 nFh'vr
>kk
> don't use embedded
U B ⅞ --size raw
>j
> Check this optionr to not use f embedded jpeg from the raw file but Toi6jvqj
> process the jq datag. This is slower 6g gives you color jn
Thanks for the reply. I already tried this option, unfortunately it
didn't help. It makes the preview look like the dark table processing
and not the in-camera processing but the fuzziness is still there . And
as soon as I make any changes to the RAW, the embedded preview isn't
used anymore any
Am Montag, 30. Dezember 2013, 14:03:25 schrieb Joeheb:
> Thanks for the reply. I already tried this option, unfortunately it didn't
> help. It makes the preview look like the dark table processing and not the
> in-camera processing but the fuzziness is still there . And as soon as I
> make any chan
ed anymore anyway.
Joeheb
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: "johannes hanika"
Gesendet: 30.12.2013 10:27
An: "pas...@obry.net"
Cc: "joe...@posteo.de" ;
"darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Betreff: Re: [darktable-devel] Lighttable preview pict
http://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch06.html.php
don't use embedded preview jpeg but half-size raw
Check this option to not use the embedded jpeg from the raw file but
process the raw data. This is slower but gives you color managed
thumbnails (default off).
On 12/30/13, Pascal Obry wrote:
>
>
Joeheb,
> I hope this is the correct place to post my issue:
>
> Issue:
> The picture in the lighttable view doesn't really look the same like
> when it is viewed in the darkroom. Everything seems to be a bit unsharp.
This is expected as the preview is just a view at low definition (see
corresp
