Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2015, 15:31:34 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> On Friday, June 19, 2015 14:37 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2015, 11:55:49 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > On Friday, June 19, 2015 11:27 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > > Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 21:57:1
On Friday, June 19, 2015 14:37 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2015, 11:55:49 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > On Friday, June 19, 2015 11:27 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 21:57:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> [...]
>
> > > > OK ... Found the proble
Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2015, 11:55:49 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> On Friday, June 19, 2015 11:27 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 21:57:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
[...]
> > > OK ... Found the problem area.
> > >
> > > There appears to be a conflict between the Ove
On Friday, June 19, 2015 11:27 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 21:57:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > On Thursday, June 18, 2015 21:28 David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schr
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 21:57:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> On Thursday, June 18, 2015 21:28 David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > > On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58
On Thursday, June 18, 2015 21:28 David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb D
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > > darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> >
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > > darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> >
Some modules, e.g. colour correction, prevent the underexposure indicator
from showing if you adjust dark colours.
Kofa
--
___
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 00:18 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > > darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> >
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 18:49:59 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> > >
> > > Opensuse 13.2
> > >
> > > My hightlight indicator works
On Monday, June 08, 2015 16:58 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> >
> > Opensuse 13.2
> >
> > My hightlight indicator works correctly but the underexposure indicator is
> > not working at any level. S
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 16:43:11 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
> Opensuse 13.2
>
> My hightlight indicator works correctly but the underexposure indicator is
> not working at any level. Settings for both are are std. (2%-98%).
>
> Does anybody else see this?
darktable 1.7.0.1433639708.4f9562e
Opensuse 13.2
My hightlight indicator works correctly but the underexposure indicator is not
working at any level. Settings for both are are std. (2%-98%).
Does anybody else see this?
David
14 matches
Mail list logo