On 06/02/2015 20:31, Dan Torop wrote:
> It's a good point that DR's obfuscating the EXIF's ISO info breaks the
> auto feature in profiled denoise. In the denoise (profiled) module,
> setting the profile to the appropriate ISO by hand (e.g. if a match is
> found for ISO 800, instead choosing ISO 200
It's a good point that DR's obfuscating the EXIF's ISO info breaks the
auto feature in profiled denoise. In the denoise (profiled) module,
setting the profile to the appropriate ISO by hand (e.g. if a match is
found for ISO 800, instead choosing ISO 200 for images made at DR400)
should handle this.
On 06/02/2015 12:40, Björn Sonnenschein wrote:
> Hi all,
> If DR200/DR400 is used on Fuji X-Trans Cameras like my X-E1, the ISO value
> actually used will be 1 (2) ev steps lower than the one written to the exiv
> files. So ISO 800 with DR400 will show as ISO 800 in the exiv, but actually
> the
Hi all,
If DR200/DR400 is used on Fuji X-Trans Cameras like my X-E1, the ISO value
actually used will be 1 (2) ev steps lower than the one written to the exiv
files. So ISO 800 with DR400 will show as ISO 800 in the exiv, but actually the
image was captured at ISO 200. Does the Profiled Denoise
