Remco Viëtor schrieb am 06.11.20 um 07:01:
he was advised that the easiest way would be to use Nikon's
software. Some versions of which have been noted for modifying the NEFs,
making them unreadable for many other programs, among which dt.
That second sentence was exactly what I was
On vendredi 6 novembre 2020 05:29:37 CET David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> This conversation is taking place on a darktable forum ... I am not sure
> why options for corrupting a RAW file with other pieces of software is
> really relevant.
Well, OP was asking about getting the same output from his raw
This conversation is taking place on a darktable forum ... I am not sure
why options for corrupting a RAW file with other pieces of software is
really relevant.
On 2020-11-05 7:09 p.m., ternaryd wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 03:06:23 +0100
Bernhard wrote:
David Vincent-Jones schrieb am
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 03:06:23 +0100
Bernhard wrote:
>> David Vincent-Jones schrieb am 05.11.20 um
22:57:
>> Darktable is a non-destructive image
>> editor and the user is totally unable to
>> write or change the RAW file in any way.
> that's right.
> But: Nikon software (ViewNX) writes into the
>
David Vincent-Jones schrieb am 05.11.20 um 22:57:
Darktable is a non-destructive image editor and the user is totally
unable to write or change the RAW file in any way.
that's right.
But: Nikon software (ViewNX) writes into the RAW file instead of
creating a xmp file.
And that crap from
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 17:45, Martin Straeten
wrote:
> You might use this:
> https://pixls.us/articles/profiling-a-camera-with-darktable-chart/
> But this approach isn’t useful when using filmic, since color lookup table
> and tonecurve are mandatory.
> Best solution to get nikon colors is using
Darktable is a non-destructive image editor and the user is totally
unable to write or change the RAW file in any way.
On 2020-11-05 1:49 a.m., Remco Viëtor wrote:
On jeudi 5 novembre 2020 09:15:37 CET Archie Macintosh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 06:44, Martin Straeten
wrote:
Best
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 09:49, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> Raw development is good if you do *not* like the look your camera produces, or
> when you have images the camera software can't handle (images with high
> dynamic range come to mind, or images with a lot of "led blue", like some
> theatre
On jeudi 5 novembre 2020 09:15:37 CET Archie Macintosh wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 06:44, Martin Straeten
> wrote:
>
> > Best solution to get nikon colors is using the software provided by nikon
>
> Indeed. Isn’t that the digital equivalent of choosing to use
> Kodachrome — the sort of
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 06:44, Martin Straeten wrote:
>
> Best solution to get nikon colors is using the software provided by nikon
Indeed. Isn’t that the digital equivalent of choosing to use
Kodachrome — the sort of choice we all made in the film days when
there was no equivalent to what we
10 matches
Mail list logo
