A post detailing the lua changes for darktable 3.6 is at
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/lua-updates-for-darktable-3-6/25686
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to
Thanks Kovcs, I will
On 01/07/21 11:35, KOVÁCS István wrote:
Hello,
You may want to try signing up on discuss.pixls.us, which is now the
recommended way to interact with the community, including the
developers. https://www.darktable.org/contact/ mentions the mailing
lists as 'last resort'.
Hello,
You may want to try signing up on discuss.pixls.us, which is now the
recommended way to interact with the community, including the
developers. https://www.darktable.org/contact/ mentions the mailing
lists as 'last resort'.
Make sure all your applications are properly colour managed.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:52 AM GianLuca Sarto wrote:
> Not sure if it is a color profile problem, given the monochromatic image.
>
The speed of transition from dark tones to light tones is part of the
profile, so it affects BW images as well, to my knowledge.
> The comparison is made on
Not sure if it is a color profile problem, given the monochromatic image.
The comparison is made on screen, between Darktable and Gimp.
In Gimp, the image is a little darker, so shadows' detail is partially lost.
I would have expected that the tiff in Gimp was an exact copy of DT.
On
Howdy,
What about the color profile associated with the TIFF and how was it
managed by GIMP and by your printer?
When you say that you "compared the Tiff with the image on DT", how did you
do exactly?
At first sight, I would say that you experienced a problem in color
management. But correct me
Hello All,
I was working [DT v3.4.1, Linux] on a BW image, when finished, I
exported to Tiff, leaving Profile/Intent as Image Settings.
Later, when I printed the image with Gimp, I noticed that the image on
paper was darker and some detail in the shadows was lost.
I thought it was a
