On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:40:39 -0800
"I. Ivanov" wrote:
>It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually
>export @95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps
>you have reasons to compress further I didn't try higher
>compressions.
Try webpages with:
https://dev
It is good that it works for you (one way or another). I usually export
@95% and it seems to work well quality vs size. But perhaps you have
reasons to compress further I didn't try higher compressions.
Regards,
B
On 2017-01-18 02:36 PM, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:19:35 -0800
"I. Ivanov" wrote:
>No I didn't... but the images were @100%. I just wanted to point out
>that the viewer can influence the perception. Based on what I have
>seen I believe DT is working as expected. The way how the other
>viewers render the image however can va
