Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-15 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Michael [07-15-16 12:28]: > This is the thread to which I was referring. Could someone tell me more > about this and how to get the messages in this thread? > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Michele Tameni wrote: > > > Much better, maybe a little "overexposed" but definitely better. How w

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-15 Thread Pascal Obry
Michele, > Much better, maybe a little "overexposed" but definitely better. How > we can contribute to get this included in Darktable?  I was probably not clear. This D800 curve is in darktable I have contributed it 2 years ago. A bit over exposed is maybe because you have a D810 and not a D800,

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-15 Thread Michael
This is the thread to which I was referring. Could someone tell me more about this and how to get the messages in this thread? On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Michele Tameni wrote: > Much better, maybe a little "overexposed" but definitely better. How we > can contribute to get this included i

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-15 Thread Michele Tameni
Much better, maybe a little "overexposed" but definitely better. How we can contribute to get this included in Darktable? I'll try it more over the weekend, and let you know the results. Could some more pics be useful? in case of what type? Thankyou very much for your help! Michele 2016-07-14 23

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-14 Thread Pascal Obry
Le jeudi 14 juillet 2016 à 20:36 +0200, Michele Tameni a écrit : > ther's something that dk can improve as default setting for the d810? > In case i can provide a lot of image if needed. Just tested, indeed the D810 is not profiled and is using the "nikon like" base curve which is quite bad. Using

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-14 Thread Pascal Obry
Michele, > Maybe I have not explained well my thoughts. > With the d300 the difference from the camera jpeg and the raw default > setting was minimal. > I see a huge difference with the D810. With some processing I can > achieve good result too even with the d810 but it require much more > effort

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-14 Thread Michele Tameni
Maybe I have not explained well my thoughts. With the d300 the difference from the camera jpeg and the raw default setting was minimal. I see a huge difference with the D810. With some processing I can achieve good result too even with the d810 but it require much more effort. Maybe is just the pro

Re: [darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-14 Thread JB
Hi Michele, I'm also a D810 owner and mostly unsatisfied with my raw processing. Didn't quite understand your question. Differences between d300 and D810 or D810 an D810? Anyway: here's my quick attempt with your picture – nice scenery. Processing details contained in the jpg.

[darktable-user] D810 and darktable

2016-07-14 Thread Michele Tameni
Hi all, I'm a darktable users since some time now, and I was happily using it with my old nikon d300 and now with my D810. checking some old pics I found a really huge difference on the camera jpg and the dk default sharpness and results in general What do you think about this: http://owncloud.ta