Incredible :) Yes, this works. Thanks Remco.
Would be nice though to have these kind of functions right where the
rest is, or with a plus and minus sign to choose how the next aplied
mask is going to behave on the first one created.
Jack
Op 31-08-18 om 15:50 schreef Remco Viëtor:
On vend
On vendredi 31 août 2018 14:07:58 CEST kneops wrote:
> Am I right in understanding that I can combine one (set of) drawn masks
> with a parametric mask, but that I cannot add or substract one drawn
> mask from another drawn mask?
>
> I'm thinking of the way selections work in other software where
Not sure it works in all cases.
But I did do the same thing with exposure, albeit it was not a strong
adjustment (exposure was +0.5 on a gredient). Because I did it via two
modules, and the way the pixel pipe works, there likely is the potential
for data loss and not get a "perfect reversal". In my
Am I right in understanding that I can combine one (set of) drawn masks
with a parametric mask, but that I cannot add or substract one drawn
mask from another drawn mask?
I'm thinking of the way selections work in other software where you can
add or substract a new selection from an already ex
