On 04/01/2013 06:01 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
Hi!
>> Recently, I learned that dt stores the processing history in the exif
>> information of the created JPG. I wonder if there is also a procedure to
>> recover this history from the JPG to a usable xmp-file for dt. Does this
>> exist? If so, how
Am 01.04.2013 17:57, schrieb Alexander Wagner:
> Hi!
>
> Recently, I learned that dt stores the processing history in the exif
> information of the created JPG. I wonder if there is also a procedure to
> recover this history from the JPG to a usable xmp-file for dt. Does this
> exist? If so, how wo
Hi!
Recently, I learned that dt stores the processing history in the exif
information of the created JPG. I wonder if there is also a procedure to
recover this history from the JPG to a usable xmp-file for dt. Does this
exist? If so, how would one do that?
--
Kind regards,/
Hi!
If I import a folder containing raws with associated XMP files that
contain keywords not yet known to dt, it seems that the keywords box
does not get updated properly. At least it seems that I need to restart
dt first before I get new keywords displayed within the keywords box.
Or is there
I cannot any longer achieve a satisfying result with the spot removal
module. Has something been changed recently (I use 1.1.4 version). Whatever
size/direction I try the spot is never covered/removed.
I don't remember having had such problems in the past.
Thanks for any hint,
Marie-Noëlle
--
Am Montag, 1. April 2013, 13:37:03 schrub Per H. Lundbech:
[...]
> It would be nice with an option as to where to store it. Especially as
> the styles/presets are stores there also.
Edit ~/.config/darktable/darktablerc and change the "database" key.
The logic is as follows:
- When the key is mi
Am 01.04.2013 13:37, schrieb Per H. Lundbech:
> Unfortunately on a system like mine, years old, I have kept a backup of
> all (well most ;) ) .* directories and that has grown to 30+GB of data.
> Not all of absolutely vital importance! It also includes all software
> installed under WINE and Ubuntu
On 1 April 2013 13:37, Per H. Lundbech wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 01:22 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> > Am 01.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Alexander Wagner:
> >> On 04/01/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Spannagel wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>> yes, the file you mentioned is the darktable library. However, no
> >>> inf
On 04/01/2013 01:22 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Am 01.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Alexander Wagner:
>> On 04/01/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Spannagel wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> yes, the file you mentioned is the darktable library. However, no
>>> information is lost even if you delete this library since all image
Am 01.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Alexander Wagner:
> On 04/01/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Spannagel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> yes, the file you mentioned is the darktable library. However, no
>> information is lost even if you delete this library since all image
>> processing specific information and tags are redun
On 04/01/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Spannagel wrote:
Hi!
> yes, the file you mentioned is the darktable library. However, no
> information is lost even if you delete this library since all image
> processing specific information and tags are redundantly written in the
> XMP files along with every image
Hi Christian,
yes, the file you mentioned is the darktable library. However, no
information is lost even if you delete this library since all image
processing specific information and tags are redundantly written in the
XMP files along with every image file. You just have to reimport them
into dar
Hello all,
Since Darktable didn't ask where to keep the database and I could not find
it in Settings/Core Options, I have to assume it's the file I wrote in the
subject?
If that's the case, I think it would be a valuable improvement to ask user
for where to store this file. It needs to be backed u
13 matches
Mail list logo